Renting in Sacramento
As the state capital and a magnet for renters priced out of the Bay Area, Sacramento has faced years of rising rents and historically low vacancy. The City Council responded by adopting the Sacramento Tenant Protection Program (also called the Tenant Protection Act) in 2019, which took effect September 12, 2019. Unlike Culver City or West Hollywood, Sacramento's ordinance was passed directly by the City Council rather than by voters β and a 2020 ballot measure that would have made the law more protective, including adding mandatory relocation assistance, failed to pass. The result is a program that closely tracks AB 1482's statewide framework but applies specifically to Sacramento's pre-1995 housing stock, with the current annual cap sitting at roughly 8.6% for 2026.
π Sacramento Tenant Protection Program (Tenant Protection Act)
What Units Are Covered?
Almost all multi-unit residential rental buildings within Sacramento city limits built before February 1, 1995, including apartments and non-owner-occupied duplexes. Single-family homes, condominiums, and owner-occupied duplexes are excluded from the local ordinance, though they may still be covered separately by statewide AB 1482.
How the Rent Cap Works
Sacramento calculates its allowable annual increase using the same formula as AB 1482: a 5% base plus the change in the California Consumer Price Index, with a hard ceiling of 10%. The City announced the 2026 adjustment at approximately 8.6%, based on a reported 3.6% April CPI increase. Only one rent increase is permitted per tenancy in any 12-month period. The ordinance does not clearly state whether landlords may "bank" an unused increase from a year they didn't raise rent and apply it later β this point is legally ambiguous, so tenants facing an unusually large increase citing banked amounts from prior years should have it reviewed by a tenant attorney or the Code Compliance program.
Key Rules
- β For tenancies that existed when the ordinance took effect, the "base rent" used to calculate future increases is the rent that was in effect on July 1, 2019
- β For tenancies that began after July 1, 2019, base rent is simply the initial contracted rent from the lease
- β Any lease clause attempting to waive a tenant's rights under this ordinance is void as against public policy β it does not matter if you signed it
- β A landlord's failure to comply with any requirement of the ordinance is an automatic affirmative defense in an unlawful detainer lawsuit
- β Units not covered by this local ordinance (post-1995 construction, single-family homes without a Costa-Hawkins exemption, etc.) may still be protected by statewide AB 1482
Common Exemptions
- β Units with a certificate of occupancy issued on or after February 1, 1995
- β Single-family homes, condominiums, and stock cooperatives
- β Owner-occupied duplexes where the owner lives in one unit
- β Units where the tenant shares a bathroom or kitchen with the property owner
- β Hotels, motels, inns, and rooming/boarding houses renting primarily to transient guests for stays under 30 days
- β Hospitals, medical care facilities, residential care facilities, and group homes for seniors or people with disabilities
- β Transitional housing programs for people experiencing homelessness
- β Convents, monasteries, and dormitories or fraternity/sorority housing owned by an accredited educational institution
π‘ Sacramento Tenant Protection Program β Just Cause Provisions
The same pre-1995 multi-unit buildings covered by the local rent cap. Once a tenant has lived in a covered unit for 12 months, the landlord must have a legally recognized just cause reason to terminate the tenancy β matching the 12-month threshold used under AB 1482, rather than the "day one" trigger some other California cities have adopted.
β At-Fault Just Causes
- β’ Failure to pay rent after a compliant 3-day notice to pay or quit
- β’ Breach of the rental agreement after the landlord has served a written notice to cease, given a reasonable opportunity to cure, and warned that failure to cure may result in eviction
- β’ Refusal to give the landlord lawful access to the unit
- β’ Engaging in criminal activity or creating a nuisance on the property
π No-Fault Just Causes
- β’ Owner or qualifying family member move-in
- β’ Withdrawal of the unit from the rental market (Ellis Act)
- β’ Substantial remodel or demolition requiring permits
- β’ Compliance with a government order to vacate
π° Required Relocation Assistance
- $ Sacramento's local ordinance does NOT itself require relocation assistance for no-fault evictions β this is a meaningful gap compared to LA, San Francisco, Oakland, Berkeley, West Hollywood, and Culver City, all of which mandate local relocation payments
- $ A 2020 ballot measure that would have added mandatory relocation assistance to the Sacramento ordinance was placed before voters and failed to pass
- $ For units also covered by statewide AB 1482, the state law's separate one-month relocation requirement for no-fault evictions may still apply β this is an area where tenants should get direct confirmation from a tenant attorney or the Code Compliance program, since the interaction between the two laws is not entirely settled
β Sacramento-Specific Protections You Won't Find Everywhere
No Local Relocation Assistance Requirement
Unlike most other major California cities with local rent control, Sacramento's ordinance does not require landlords to pay relocation assistance for no-fault evictions. Voters had a chance to add this protection in a 2020 ballot measure, but it failed. If you're facing a no-fault eviction in Sacramento, don't assume you're automatically entitled to a payout the way you would be in LA, SF, Oakland, or Culver City β confirm your situation with a tenant attorney, since AB 1482's separate statewide relocation duty may or may not apply depending on your unit's specific coverage.
Lease Waivers of Tenant Rights Are Void
Sacramento's ordinance explicitly states that any lease provision attempting to waive a tenant's rights under the Tenant Protection Program is void as a matter of public policy. If your lease contains language suggesting you've given up your right to just cause protection or the rent cap, that language has no legal effect β even though you signed it.
Landlord Non-Compliance Is an Automatic Defense
If your landlord fails to comply with any requirement of the Tenant Protection Program β whether it's the notice-to-cease process, the rent cap calculation, or proper just cause documentation β that failure by itself becomes an affirmative defense you can raise in an unlawful detainer lawsuit. This gives Sacramento tenants a direct, built-in way to challenge procedurally defective evictions.
Extensive, Specific Exemption List
Sacramento's ordinance spells out an unusually long and specific list of exempt housing types β including convents, monasteries, fraternity and sorority houses, and transitional homelessness programs β in addition to the more typical single-family home and post-1995 construction exemptions. If you live in an unusual housing arrangement, check this list carefully before assuming you are or are not covered.
Ambiguous Rules on "Banking" Increases
The ordinance does not clearly say whether a landlord who skips a rent increase in one year can "bank" that unused amount and add it to a future increase. If your landlord cites banked increases from prior years to justify a jump above the current year's cap, that claim sits in a legal gray area β have it reviewed by the Code Compliance program or a tenant attorney before assuming it's valid.
π Sacramento Code Compliance β Tenant Protection Program
Hours: MonβFri 8amβ5pm
What the Rent Board Can Help You With (Free):
π Free Legal Aid in Sacramento
β Tenant Organizations in Sacramento
π Eviction Court in Sacramento
Sacramento County Superior Court β Carol Miller Justice Center
π 301 Bicentennial Cir, Sacramento, CA 95826
Sacramento unlawful detainer cases are heard at the Carol Miller Justice Center, primarily in Department 88. Court info line: (916) 875-7746. Self-help and mediation program: (916) 875-7843. 10 business days to respond after service (AB 2347, 2025).